Head-to-head
TB-500 vs CJC-1295
A field-by-field comparison of TB-500 and CJC-1295 drawn from the PeptideIndex database: mechanism, evidence grade, half-life, administration route, reported dosing, side effects, storage and legal status. They belong to different categories — recovery & repair and growth hormone — so this page focuses on what each one actually does rather than which is "better".
TB-500 vs CJC-1295 at a glance
| Attribute | TB-500 | CJC-1295 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Recovery & repair | Growth hormone |
| Evidence grade | Emerging | Moderate |
| Also known as | Thymosin Beta-4 fragment, TB4 | Modified GRF 1-29, DAC:GRF |
| Chain | 7 amino acids (actin-binding domain of Tβ4) | 30 amino acid GHRH analogue |
| Mechanism | Binds G-actin and promotes actin polymerisation, which drives cell migration into damaged tissue. It also stimulates endothelial cell differentiation and new capillary growth, and downregulates inflammatory cytokines. | Binds pituitary GHRH receptors to increase both the amplitude of GH pulses and total GH secretion. The DAC (drug affinity complex) version binds serum albumin, extending the half-life from minutes to about a week. |
| Reported benefits | Improved cell migration and wound closure in animal studies · Reported flexibility gains and reduced muscle spasm · Systemic action rather than site-specific, unlike BPC-157 | Elevated GH and IGF-1 across the dosing window · Improved sleep depth reported by most users · Supports lean mass retention and fat oxidation |
| Reported side effects | Fatigue or head-rush after dosing · Injection-site reaction · Theoretical tumour-growth concern given angiogenic activity | Water retention · Tingling or numbness in hands · Head rush and flushing after injection · Elevated fasting glucose at higher doses |
| Half-life | Roughly 2–3 hours, with tissue effects lasting far longer | ~30 minutes without DAC; ~6–8 days with DAC |
| Administration | Subcutaneous or intramuscular injection | Subcutaneous injection, typically before bed on an empty stomach |
| Dosing overview | Loading phase of 2–5 mg twice weekly for 4–6 weeks, then a lower maintenance dose | 100 mcg (no-DAC) 1–3× daily, or 1–2 mg weekly for the DAC version |
| Storage | Powder at room temperature short term; reconstituted 2–8 °C for up to 30 days | Refrigerate reconstituted product; protect from light and avoid shaking |
| Legal status | Not approved for human use; sold for research purposes only. | Not FDA-approved. Prescribed off-label by some clinics; banned in sport. |
Key differences between TB-500 and CJC-1295
Different categories, different goals
TB-500 is indexed under recovery & repair, while CJC-1295 sits under growth hormone. They are not substitutes for one another: TB-500 is described as "A synthetic version of the active region of thymosin beta-4, a naturally occurring wound-healing protein present in nearly all human cells." and CJC-1295 as "A growth-hormone-releasing hormone analogue that raises the baseline of natural GH output rather than replacing it."
Mechanism of action
TB-500: Binds G-actin and promotes actin polymerisation, which drives cell migration into damaged tissue. It also stimulates endothelial cell differentiation and new capillary growth, and downregulates inflammatory cytokines. CJC-1295: Binds pituitary GHRH receptors to increase both the amplitude of GH pulses and total GH secretion. The DAC (drug affinity complex) version binds serum albumin, extending the half-life from minutes to about a week.
Evidence quality is not equal
TB-500 carries a Emerging evidence grade and CJC-1295 a Moderate grade on this index. The grade describes the quality of published human data, not how well a compound works — CJC-1295 has the better-documented record of the two, and claims made about TB-500 rest on thinner human evidence.
Half-life and dosing frequency
TB-500 is listed at roughly 2–3 hours, with tissue effects lasting far longer; CJC-1295 at ~30 minutes without dac; ~6–8 days with dac. That difference is what drives the reported schedules: Loading phase of 2–5 mg twice weekly for 4–6 weeks, then a lower maintenance dose versus 100 mcg (no-DAC) 1–3× daily, or 1–2 mg weekly for the DAC version
Route of administration
TB-500 is administered by subcutaneous or intramuscular injection. CJC-1295 is administered by subcutaneous injection, typically before bed on an empty stomach.
Legal and regulatory status differs
TB-500: Not approved for human use; sold for research purposes only. CJC-1295: Not FDA-approved. Prescribed off-label by some clinics; banned in sport. This is usually the most practical difference between two compounds, because it determines whether a supply chain is labelled and regulated at all.
Handling and storage
TB-500 is stored powder at room temperature short term; reconstituted 2–8 °c for up to 30 days. CJC-1295 is stored refrigerate reconstituted product; protect from light and avoid shaking.
What TB-500 and CJC-1295 have in common
On the attributes tracked in this database — category, evidence grade, mechanism, half-life, administration, dosing overview, storage and legal status — TB-500 and CJC-1295 share no identical values. They are compared here because they come up together in the same searches, not because they overlap.
Each compound in brief
TB-500
Recovery & repair · Emerging evidence
A synthetic version of the active region of thymosin beta-4, a naturally occurring wound-healing protein present in nearly all human cells.
Considerations: Frequently stacked with BPC-157 in anecdotal recovery protocols · Human data is limited to Tβ4 trials in dry-eye and cardiac injury · Prohibited by WADA at all times
CJC-1295
Growth hormone · Moderate evidence
A growth-hormone-releasing hormone analogue that raises the baseline of natural GH output rather than replacing it.
Considerations: Usually paired with a GHRP such as Ipamorelin for a synergistic pulse · No-DAC (Mod GRF 1-29) suits pulsatile dosing; DAC suits steady elevation · GH elevation is not desirable for everyone — screen for cancer history
Related comparisons and reading
Every figure on this page is reproduced from the compound profiles in this database and reflects published literature and commonly reported protocols. It is educational information, not medical advice, and not a recommendation to use either compound. See the medical disclaimer.