All peptides
LongevityEmerging

NAD+

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide

A central metabolic coenzyme injected or infused in longevity clinics; declining NAD+ is a hallmark of biological ageing.

How it works

Serves as an electron carrier in redox reactions and as the required substrate for sirtuins and PARP enzymes, which govern DNA repair and mitochondrial biogenesis.

Structure: Coenzyme (dinucleotide, not a peptide)

Reported benefits

  • Reported energy and mental-clarity improvements
  • Supports sirtuin-mediated DNA repair pathways
  • Used adjunctively in recovery clinics

Practical considerations

  • Precursors (NR, NMN) are cheaper and orally available with better human data
  • Infusions must be run slowly or they are extremely uncomfortable
  • Benefit in healthy young adults is unclear

Side effects and risks

  • Flushing, chest tightness and nausea during rapid infusion
  • Injection-site pain
  • Headache

NAD+ dosing overview

IV 250–750 mg per session; subcutaneous 50–100 mg several times weekly

Reported NAD+ dosing ranges by context
ContextAmountFrequencyRoute
Clinic IV infusion250–750 mgPer session, over 2–4 hoursIntravenous
Subcutaneous protocol50–100 mgSeveral times weeklySubcutaneous

This describes doses reported in published literature and community protocols. It is not a recommendation, and it is not a substitute for clinical supervision.

NAD+ FAQ

Why are NAD+ infusions so slow?

Rapid infusion commonly causes chest tightness, nausea and flushing. Slowing the drip to several hours is how clinics manage it.

Is IV NAD+ better than oral NR or NMN?

Unproven. Precursors have more human pharmacokinetic data behind them; direct NAD+ infusion has more anecdote and less evidence that intact NAD+ enters cells rather than being degraded first.

Is NAD+ a peptide?

No — it is a coenzyme, not a peptide. It is included here because it sits in the same clinic and longevity protocols people research alongside peptides.

Research references

  • Covarrubias et al., 2021 — NAD+ metabolism in ageing, Nature Reviews